Skip to content

From no-code to production code, without the rewrite tax.

</>FullCodeby Yo! No Code
LovableNext.js or Vite + React

The demo works. Now make it something you can run a business on.

We keep the product Lovable built and rebuild the foundation underneath it: typed data flow, real authorisation, tests, and structure a senior engineer can extend without fear.

See the migration map
Frontend
Next.js or Vite + React
Backend
Node.js / Server Actions
Database
PostgreSQL + Prisma
Host
Vercel
Why this stack

What you get when you move Lovable to Next.js or Vite + React.

The product survives, the shortcuts don't

We clone what the app does, not how the generator did it. Users see the same product; your team inherits a codebase with a spine.

Authorisation that actually holds

Generated apps routinely check permissions in the UI and nowhere else. Every mutation gets server-side row-level authorisation, with tests proving it.

A real data model

Loosely typed blobs become a typed schema with foreign keys and migrations you can replay. This is the change that makes everything afterwards cheaper.

Bundle discipline

Full library imports for single functions, duplicate dependencies, and unoptimised assets get cleaned out. Typical result is a large drop in first-load JavaScript.

Tests where they matter

Not coverage theatre — tests on the money paths, the auth boundaries, and the data migrations, so the next change does not require courage.

The migration map

Lovable concept → Next.js or Vite + React equivalent

The exact mental model we use during migration. If you're scoping internally, copy this table.

Generated components
Reviewed React components
Deduplicated, typed props, single-child wrappers flattened.
Inline data fetching
Typed data layer
Queries centralised, cached, and typed end to end.
Client-side permission checks
Server-side authorisation
The single most common security gap in generated apps.
Loose schema / JSON columns
Prisma models
Real types, real relations, replayable migrations.
Hardcoded secrets or keys
Environment + secret manager
Rotated, scoped, and out of the repository history.
Generated auth
Clerk / Auth0 / your IdP
Session handling that has been audited by someone other than a model.
Placeholder assets
Optimised media pipeline
Responsive variants, modern formats, correct dimensions.
The 6-step process

Predictable. Auditable. Reversible.

1

Codebase audit

We read the whole thing and produce an honest report: what is salvageable, what needs replacing, and where the security gaps are. You get this before committing to the full engagement.

2

Schema first

The data model is designed properly and migrated, because everything else is cheaper once it is right.

3

Auth and authorisation

Real auth provider, server-side authorisation on every mutation, tests on each boundary.

4

Component rebuild

UI preserved, internals reviewed and rewritten where the generated code cannot be safely extended.

5

Test and observability layer

Tests on critical paths, structured logging, error tracking, and alerts that fire before your users tell you.

6

Handover

Documentation, architecture decision records, and a walkthrough with whoever will own it next.

Savings calculator

How much will you actually save?

A rough but realistic estimate based on real client benchmarks. Hosting and per-seat fees only — engineering productivity gains are on top.

2,000
10010k25k50k

30–100 screens, custom integrations, role-based access.

Your migration math
No-code today
$1,129/mo
$13,548 / yr
On owned code
$850/mo
$10,200 / yr
Monthly savings
$279
$3,348 annual · $16,740 over 5 years
Migration investment
$7,500
One-time, fixed price
Payback period
27 mo
Based on hosting & seats only
See real client numbers

Estimates use median list pricing for the selected platform and median DigitalOcean / Vercel hosting for an equivalent code-based app, plus modest dev-ops time. Real numbers depend on usage, integrations, and compliance scope.

Case studies

Real teams. Real numbers. No names.

We protect our clients' privacy by referring to them by industry, region, and stage. Every metric below is a direct lift from a delivered migration.

HealthTech SaaS · North America

Series A, ~50,000 monthly users

Bubble.io + XanoNext.js + Node.js + PostgreSQL

Workflow timeouts during peak loads and an upcoming SOC 2 audit that the no-code stack could not satisfy.

"We thought the move would freeze the product for months. The team shipped feature parity in five weeks and we passed SOC 2 right after."
VP of Engineering, HealthTech SaaS
4.2×
faster page loads
$145k
saved per year
SOC 2
Type II ready in 90 days
Pricing

Three ways to get out of no-code.

Fixed-price packages. Scope is locked at the kickoff. Anything not on the list is free during the migration window.

Standard Migration

Lift-and-shift to a clean codebase

From $1,975
2–5 weeks · $35k–$85k / yr saved

Single-product apps under 30 screens with standard integrations.

  • Full UI/UX recreation, pixel-faithful
  • Up to 25 workflows ported and tested
  • PostgreSQL or MongoDB schema, fully migrated
  • Deploy to Vercel, Netlify, or your AWS
  • 30-day post-launch support
Most chosen
Premium Migration

Production-grade with custom integrations

From $7,500
4–8 weeks · $85k–$200k / yr saved

Apps with custom integrations, real users, and growth pressure.

  • Everything in Standard
  • Unlimited workflows + custom integrations
  • Performance budget: <1.5s LCP, <100ms TTFB
  • OAuth/SSO, role-based access, audit logs
  • Staging + production environments
  • 60-day post-launch support
Enterprise Migration

Compliance-grade, dedicated team

Custom quote
6–12 weeks · $200k–$500k / yr saved

Regulated industries, multi-tenant SaaS, mission-critical apps.

  • Everything in Premium
  • Dedicated migration squad (PM, 2 seniors, QA)
  • SOC 2 / HIPAA / GDPR / PCI controls baked in
  • Multi-region deploy + DR plan
  • Source code escrow & IP transfer
  • 90-day post-launch support + retainer option

Need only the backend, only the public site, or just one module? Ask about Partial Migration — same workflow, scoped to what hurts most.

Frequently asked

LovableNext.js or Vite + React questions

Is it cheaper to fix the Lovable app or rebuild it?+

It depends on the data model. If the schema is sound, hardening is usually cheaper. If the data model is loose, rebuilding on a proper schema costs less than retrofitting one. The audit in step one tells you which case you are in, and we will say so plainly even when the answer is the cheaper one.

Will my app go down during this?+

No. The existing app keeps serving while the hardened version is built and validated. Cutover is a DNS flip with a rollback path.

Can you work with the Lovable app's existing Supabase backend?+

Yes. We can keep Supabase and fix the schema and policies in place, or migrate to a Postgres instance you control. Both are common.

Ready when you are

You shipped fast on no-code.
Now ship faster, on code.

30-minute scoping call · pixel-faithful migration plan · fixed-price quote within 48 hours. No NDA gymnastics.

Or join the Codify Yo! beta
✓ No NDA upfront✓ Free 1-page architecture audit✓ Fixed-price quote in 48 hours